


| This is not the first time that I have gathered an online community of friends and acquaintances. For about four years in the mid-nineties I had been a part of a wide-spread online group with a common interest; some people were volunteering time towards updating and maintaining information on the subject, others were purely consumers of the information, but we were all bound by that common thread.
As they traveled and I traveled, some of us got to meet face to face. The only constant about these events is that you never know what it is going to be like. Some people's personalities are exactly the way you perceived them to be online, others have a shadow of themselves present, and still others are completely different.
Some people that you have been talking with for hours on end online you barely have two words to say to when you meet in real life, with others who were the online equivalent of nodding acquaintances you get along like a house on fire.
Having been securely hooked on an Internet life to the extent where most of the people online became more real than people next to me, I know the dangers of becoming too immersed in the online world. But the question remains: is online life any less real than "reality?"
Each of us wears a mask - or even many different masks - every day in our dealings with people in the physical work. Do the distance and the medium really make that much difference? (Note that I am not talking about predators or dating here, where misrepresentation has ulterior motives and potentially dangerous results.)
The next question is whether it is a good idea to meet an online friend face to face. It is a given that at least in some ways they will be different than what you expected - will this difference irrevocably color (and harm) your online friendship?
I know that I frequently wish to know more about authors when I read their books, but also that I am frequently disappointed and sometimes even put off if I find out too much about them; not so much in terms of biographical detail, but rather when they speak in their own voice. Their human pettiness, small concerns and views opposing my own on issues important to me can ruin my enjoyment of their prose.
Nevertheless, I am slowly starting to meet the people behind the blogs. My recent experience was a good one: she was not exactly as I had pictured her (personality-wise), but then again she wasn't too much different either.
Unfortunately her experience of me must have been somewhere along the lines of "Oh my goodness, doesn't this woman ever shut up? And how much longer is she still going to keep pointing the camera at yet another flower or fountain or something?"
My overwhelming experience was one of regret that she doesn't live in the city here, because I think that once we get over the awkwardness of first meetings, we might have a whole lot to talk about - the kind of talking that involves a fireplace and red wine or cocoa, and really comfortable chairs.
Aah well... I guess I'll just have to keep reading her blog.
|
Comments (5)
If I had to meet you one day, after only knowing you from reading your blog, I would meet the person that you really are. I would not be surprised at all. I think you portray a very accurate image of yourself, your likes, dislikes, pet hates and loves on your blog. But then, I know you, well I think I do, I hope I do...
What I am trying to say is I like you, and I like your blog and I think the one is an exact zipped version of the other.
Posted by nini | May 11, 2005 6:04 PM
Posted on May 11, 2005 18:04
Thoughtful and beautiful post..I liked your quote on 'Everybody wears a mask in daily dealings..'!!! Its quite true that sometimes having a face to face meeting with an online acquaintance can lead to a bit of disappointment or frustration due to mismatch in the thought process of one or both of them. One could rather end up reading the online blogs and stay virtual and not step in the real world.
I would say..what the hell, we all are different and there could be situations where we dislike a few and cases where we are being disliked. The bigger picture is when there is no malicious intent involved from either parties I see no harm in such meetings, infact it would be mutually beneficial and it could lead to a good community of like-minded invidivuals.
Posted by Sowmy | May 11, 2005 8:36 PM
Posted on May 11, 2005 20:36
Beautiful post as usual, and I have another new wallpaper to show off. People walk by and stop saying whoa! I give them your blog address for their own pleasure. Thanks.
Posted by Mary | May 12, 2005 11:31 AM
Posted on May 12, 2005 11:31
I enjoyed meeting (the other) Em when in was in New York, look forward to another mini-blogmeet in Toronto in a few weeks' time and hope to meet one or more of the UK bloggers whose work I follow - it's an interesting experience, certainly, but well worthwhile.
I think you get a reasonable idea of a blogger's personality from their pages, even if there are minor discrepancies in the real world.
Posted by Em² | May 12, 2005 11:49 AM
Posted on May 12, 2005 11:49
Sivani:
I'll be baaaaaaaack. :-)
Had a lovely time, even if Mt. Hood never came out during my visit. And I will always remember the thoughtfulness and the loving hospitality you showed to me and, by extension, to my darling daughter, who carries your contact info with her "just in case" she needs a friend close by.
Love,
Judy Anne
Posted by judyanne | May 12, 2005 6:35 PM
Posted on May 12, 2005 18:35