I have completed Lolita. Finally, last night I wrestled through the final fifty pages. And then the author's afterword. And then I went back to read Martin Amis' introduction completely.
I had started that earlier, but had abandoned it on the second page, because I felt - foolishly perhaps - that I wanted to read Lolita the first time not colored by the interpretation of others, or at least not more so than the sketchy bits to which I had been exposed so far. Which is also why I had wanted to read it before starting in earnest Reading Lolita in Tehran.
::
This drive to read a work for the first time completely fresh, experiencing only my own response to the work, has become absurdly important to me in recent years.
I know I miss many of the important themes in the book. I know that I might have a "fuller" experience if I take other opinions into account. But unless I do it this way, I will never know what my own true response was to the book, how it affected me personally.
Later, before I reread the book, I search out other opinions and critical analyses of the work, and re-evaluate both it and my perceptions in the light of these.
::
I celebrated its completion by digging into The Giver by Lois Lowry. This is a Newbery medal winner, a work frequently prescribed for high school students, about a Utopia which is based on "Sameness," where difference has been eliminated and everything is experienced at a mild level without extremes.
The book is an easy read; I started it last night before turning out the light and I finished it this morning in bed before breakfast. (MLK is our last company-paid holiday until Memorial Day). I should qualify that last statement - the read might be easy, but the material is not: it is challenging and thought-provoking.
A friend who came to lunch yesterday brought it for me to read, and I dislike holding on to borrowed books for too long, scared that I might forget to return it, or that something might happen to the book.
::
And so this morning, I started back on Reading Lolita in Tehran and also The Mistress of Spices.
Why two books together, you might ask. Well, I am reading the Nafisi aloud to my husband, so I can obviously only read that while the two of us are together with time to devote to the book. At other times I will be enjoying the Divakaruni.
Both are engaging, so that it is with reluctance that I put them down, even when only exchanging one for the other.
::
And I have another book to add to my Future reading list: The In-Between World of Vikram Lall by M.G. Vassanji. This book was a birthday gift to my precious one by his younger son, so I'll queue up behind him to read it.
I had started that earlier, but had abandoned it on the second page, because I felt - foolishly perhaps - that I wanted to read Lolita the first time not colored by the interpretation of others, or at least not more so than the sketchy bits to which I had been exposed so far. Which is also why I had wanted to read it before starting in earnest Reading Lolita in Tehran.
::
This drive to read a work for the first time completely fresh, experiencing only my own response to the work, has become absurdly important to me in recent years.
I know I miss many of the important themes in the book. I know that I might have a "fuller" experience if I take other opinions into account. But unless I do it this way, I will never know what my own true response was to the book, how it affected me personally.
Later, before I reread the book, I search out other opinions and critical analyses of the work, and re-evaluate both it and my perceptions in the light of these.
::
I celebrated its completion by digging into The Giver by Lois Lowry. This is a Newbery medal winner, a work frequently prescribed for high school students, about a Utopia which is based on "Sameness," where difference has been eliminated and everything is experienced at a mild level without extremes.
The book is an easy read; I started it last night before turning out the light and I finished it this morning in bed before breakfast. (MLK is our last company-paid holiday until Memorial Day). I should qualify that last statement - the read might be easy, but the material is not: it is challenging and thought-provoking.
A friend who came to lunch yesterday brought it for me to read, and I dislike holding on to borrowed books for too long, scared that I might forget to return it, or that something might happen to the book.
::
And so this morning, I started back on Reading Lolita in Tehran and also The Mistress of Spices.
Why two books together, you might ask. Well, I am reading the Nafisi aloud to my husband, so I can obviously only read that while the two of us are together with time to devote to the book. At other times I will be enjoying the Divakaruni.
Both are engaging, so that it is with reluctance that I put them down, even when only exchanging one for the other.
::
And I have another book to add to my Future reading list: The In-Between World of Vikram Lall by M.G. Vassanji. This book was a birthday gift to my precious one by his younger son, so I'll queue up behind him to read it.

Comments (2)
I'm enjoying your banned book reviews! Please keep it up.
Posted by Karan | January 17, 2005 3:38 PM
Posted on January 17, 2005 15:38
'The In-Between World of Vikram Lall', I just read the amazon snippet on this..It seems promising!!! It looks like my kind of book. I have added it to my library pick-up list . Thanks!!!
Posted by Sowmy | January 18, 2005 8:40 AM
Posted on January 18, 2005 08:40